← Back to dashboard 🔒 Premium — subscriber access

Pseudo-GDS Graph Analytics — Designation-Candidate Subgraph

Date: 2026-09-03 Candidates: 40 Artifacts: pipeline/graph_community_analysis.py, pipeline/data/graph_community_analysis.json

A. Jaccard Similarity — Top 10 Candidate Pairs

Jaccard Shared Union Pair
0.217 2838 13108 АНО ФЕДЕРАЛЬНОЕ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОЕ БЮДЖЕТНОЕ УЧРЕЖДЕНИЕ ЦЕНТРАЛЬНОЕ ЖИЛИЩНО-КОММУНАЛЬНОЕ УПРАВЛЕНИЕ МИНИСТЕРСТВА ОБОРОНЫ РОССИЙСКОЙ ФЕДЕРАЦИИ (7729314745) ↔ АНО ФЕДЕРАЛЬНОЕ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОЕ АВТОНОМНОЕ УЧРЕЖДЕНИЕ ЦЕНТРАЛЬНОЕ УПРАВЛЕНИЕ ЖИЛИЩНО-СОЦИАЛЬНОЙ ИНФРАСТРУКТУРЫ КОМПЛЕКСА МИНИСТЕРСТВА ОБОРОНЫ РОССИЙСКОЙ ФЕДЕРАЦИИ (5047041033)
0.042 56 1326 НАО АО "МОСОБЛГАЗ (5032292612) ↔ ГП "НАРП (5009033419)
0.042 382 9189 АНО ДЕПАРТАМЕНТ ГОРОДСКОГО ИМУЩЕСТВА ГОРОДА МОСКВЫ (7705031674) ↔ АНО ПУБЛИЧНОЕ АКЦИОНЕРНОЕ ОБЩЕСТВО РОССЕТИ МОСКОВСКИЙ РЕГИОН (5036065113)
0.027 33 1216 ЗАО "КОМПАНИЯ ТРАНСТЕЛЕКОМ (7709219099) ↔ АО " "ЭРТЕЛЕКОМ ХОЛДИНГ (5902202276)
0.027 21 789 ОАО "МГТС (7710016640) ↔ ОАО БАНК "НАВИГАТОР (7717020170)
0.025 27 1080 БЩЕСТВО С ОГРАНИЧЕННОЙ ОТВЕТСТВЕННОСТЬЮ "РУСЭНЕРГОСБЫТ (7706284124) ↔ ЗАО "КОММУН-ЭНЕРГО (4346011123)
0.024 33 1360 ГУП "МОСКОВСКИЙ МЕТРОПОЛИТЕН (7702038150) ↔ ОАО "МГТС (7710016640)
0.024 22 923 ОАО "МГТС (7710016640) ↔ ОАО "МОНОЛИТНОЕ СТРОИТЕЛЬНОЕ УПРАВЛЕНИЕ-1 (7745000111)
0.023 7 299 АНО ОБЩЕСТВО С ОГРАНИЧЕННОЙ ОТВЕТСТВЕННОСТЬЮ СТАРТ-2 (6311140474) ↔ ГУП "ПЕТЕРБУРГСКИЙ МЕТРОПОЛИТЕН (7830000970)
0.022 30 1351 ООО "ГАЗПРОМ ТЕПЛОЭНЕРГО (5007101649) ↔ НАО АО "МОСОБЛГАЗ (5032292612)

🔒 Premium brief — full access

This brief's evidentiary detail, specific targets, and designation recommendations are available to vetted compliance teams, law firms, and government analysts — as single-brief purchases or under a portfolio monitoring retainer. The teaser above shows the headline methodology; the full document includes case-number citations, target INNs, SDN-adjacency numbers, and recommended secondary-designation scope.

Already subscribed? Open the full brief with your analyst credentials. Otherwise, subscribe to portfolio monitoring for the full library, or commission this brief on its own.

Read the full brief → See access options Request by email
Basis and limitations. Findings in this brief are derived from public records — kad.arbitr.ru arbitration filings, EGRUL registry extracts, zakupki.gov.ru procurement contracts, and official sanctions lists — and from algorithmic scoring described in the methodology. Scores are triage outputs, not legal determinations. Court co-litigation measures litigation frequency with listed parties, not culpability; procurement links may reflect arm's-length commerce. Named entities may dispute factual errors via derek.linz@linzalytics.com (subject "Dispute request"); the review process and timelines are on the methodology page, and material corrections are logged at /intel/corrections.html with dates.