Russia sanctions intelligence — pricing & access

The underlying data — court records, procurement feeds, multi-jurisdiction sanctions lists — is public. The value is in the curated findings: court-verified linkages, ownership-shift alerts, and designation-grade evidence chains. Access is priced per finding, not per seat — free briefs for researchers, designation briefs for casework, portfolio-scoped monitoring for institutions with standing Russia exposure, and licensing for platforms and agencies.

Open Access
Free
Researchers, journalists, policy analysts, NGOs.
  • Live graph dashboard (KPIs, runs, data freshness)
  • 10 flagship designation & methodology briefs
  • Multi-jurisdiction sanctions cross-reference
  • Occupied-territory discovery narrative
  • Data-quality transparency page
  • Full 55-brief library
  • Master target scorecard (36,027 rows)
  • Monitoring alerts, API
Open the dashboard →
Designation Brief
€5,000 / brief
Litigation firms, bank investigations units, export control advisors — case-budgeted, expensed to a matter.
  • Single-entity designation brief — block/no-block risk score with full reasoning
  • UBO delta map — ownership shifts pre/post-invasion, proxy identification
  • Court-verified linkage — KAD case citations connecting the entity to sanctioned primes
  • Network hub map — shared directors, addresses, and co-occurrence graph
  • Immutable Evidence Bundle — raw JSON with a linked source node for every claim (KAD, EGRUL, procurement)
  • 1–2 week turnaround — deeper forensic discovery available as a €2,500 add-on
Request a brief → Pay by card →
Enterprise & Licensing
Custom
Screening platforms, data providers, government agencies, multi-analyst teams.
  • Bulk data licensing — the INN-anchored procurement + court-linkage dataset, integrated into your screening infrastructure
  • Government designation packages — €10,000–€25,000, evidentiary chains formatted for OFAC/EU intake
  • Neo4j graph API access (read-only Cypher)
  • Continuous change-monitoring with webhook/email alerts
  • Custom scrape & ingest of additional data sources
  • Named analyst engagement, quarterly strategic briefing
Contact for proposal →

FAQ

Is the underlying data proprietary?
No. Sources are all public — kad.arbitr.ru (Russian arbitration courts), OpenSanctions (EU, UK, UA, CA, AU, JP, CH, NZ lists), zakupki.gov.ru (Russian procurement). The proprietary layer is the INN-anchored graph, the cross-reference methodology, the 7-stage scraping cascade, and the analyst-structured evidence.
Why gate the full library if the data is public?
Raw sources are tens of millions of records; useful analytic output requires deliberate curation, scoring, and contextual narrative. Buyers pay for the analytic layer — not the bytes. Everyone can rebuild the pipeline from scratch; few want to.
Why no seat subscription?
The value here is concentrated in a small number of defensible findings, not in time-on-platform. Briefs are priced per finding so a litigation firm or investigations unit can expense one to a matter without a recurring budget line. Institutions that need continuity buy monitoring scoped to their own counterparty list — bounded and auditable, not an open-ended leads feed.
How fresh is the data?
The pipeline runs daily. Sanctions lists refresh from OpenSanctions on every run; court data refreshes continuously via targeted scrapers. The dashboard at /intel/ shows the age of every data artifact in hours.
What is the Evidence Bundle?
Every designation brief ships with an immutable JSON bundle in which each claim carries a linked source node — KAD case numbers, EGRUL registry extracts, procurement contract records. Your counsel or regulator can audit any statement back to the primary source.
Do you publish in real-time alongside OFAC announcements?
For monitoring and Enterprise clients: yes, with change-detection alerts tied to new OFAC/EU/UK/UA designations. Public dashboard shows aggregate counts; individual event streams are gated.
Is there a free trial?
No. The product's value sits in the findings themselves, so trial access would simply hand them over. Vetted requesters — verified organization and role — receive a proof-of-authority sample brief that demonstrates methodology and evidentiary depth on a representative target instead. Use the booking page to request one.