← Back to dashboard 🔒 Premium — subscriber access

Armstat HS-10 × Comtrade Armenia → Russia Corridor

Purpose: Combine Armenia's national customs HS-10 granularity (Armstat) with the public Comtrade Armenia→Russia HS-chapter aggregates to produce a two-level view: which HS-chapter corridors are active Armenia→RU AND where within each chapter the HS-10 line-level crashes are concentrated.

Armstat HS-10 surge rows: 298 (top_surges_existing + top_new_lines)
Distinct HS-6 parents: 238
Distinct HS-2 chapters: 16
Comtrade Armenia rows: 8

Corridor matrix (Comtrade Armenia→RU × Armstat HS-10 line counts)

HS Chapter Description Armenia→RU 2021 $ Armenia→RU 2023 $ Growth 23/21 Armstat HS-10 surge lines Lines that crashed in 2024
HS85 Electrical machinery, electronics, telecom equipme $12.2M $926.3M 76.1x 65 16
HS87 Vehicles (incl. dual-use trucks, armored variants) $9.6M $462.5M 48.1x 47 23
HS84 Machinery & mechanical appliances (incl. CNC, turb $15.3M $311.8M 20.4x 85 20
HS90 Optical, precision, measuring, medical instruments $14.9M $103.7M 6.9x 48 4
HS88 Aircraft & spacecraft $0.0M $20.5M 2 1
HS38 Miscellaneous chemical products (precursors) $12.6M $17.2M 1.4x 5 0
HS29 Organic chemicals $0.0M $6.6M 148.1x 3 1
HS89 Ships & boats $0.0M $0.1M 98.5x 0 0

🔒 Premium brief — full access

This brief's evidentiary detail, specific targets, and designation recommendations are available to vetted compliance teams, law firms, and government analysts — as single-brief purchases or under a portfolio monitoring retainer. The teaser above shows the headline methodology; the full document includes case-number citations, target INNs, SDN-adjacency numbers, and recommended secondary-designation scope.

Already subscribed? Open the full brief with your analyst credentials. Otherwise, subscribe to portfolio monitoring for the full library, or commission this brief on its own.

Read the full brief → See access options Request by email
Basis and limitations. Findings in this brief are derived from public records — kad.arbitr.ru arbitration filings, EGRUL registry extracts, zakupki.gov.ru procurement contracts, and official sanctions lists — and from algorithmic scoring described in the methodology. Scores are triage outputs, not legal determinations. Court co-litigation measures litigation frequency with listed parties, not culpability; procurement links may reflect arm's-length commerce. Named entities may dispute factual errors via derek.linz@linzalytics.com (subject "Dispute request"); the review process and timelines are on the methodology page, and material corrections are logged at /intel/corrections.html with dates.