← Back to dashboard 🔒 Premium — subscriber access

Occupied-Ukraine Communal Utilities — Crimea & Sevastopol Control Cluster

Coordinated designation package

Date: 2026-06-07 Target type: Four occupation-administration-controlled communal utilities (district heat, water, solid-waste) operating seized infrastructure in occupied Crimea and Sevastopol Status: None of the four is on the OFAC SDN list (hand-verified against OFAC SDN/aka files — see § Verification) Recommended framework: EO 13685 [blocking property of persons operating in the Crimea region of Ukraine]; EO 14024 §1(a)(vii) [owned or controlled by, or having acted for, the Government of the Russian Federation / a blocked person]

Target list

INN Legal name (EGRUL) Role / territory Controlling occupation body OT case volume
9204004793 ГУП г. Севастополя «Севтеплоэнерго» District heating — Sevastopol Government of the City of Sevastopol 2,146
9204507194 ГУП г. Севастополя «Водоканал» Water & sewerage — Sevastopol Government of the City of Sevastopol 1,390
9102007587 ГУП Республики Крым «Крымэкоресурсы» Solid-waste regional operator — Crimea Crimea Ministry of Housing & Communal Services 1,647
9102299072 АО «Крымэкоресурсы» Solid-waste operator (JSC successor) — Crimea Crimea Min. of Housing & Communal Svcs + Min. of Property & Land Relations 629
Total 5,812

🔒 Premium brief — full access

This brief's evidentiary detail, specific targets, and designation recommendations are available to vetted compliance teams, law firms, and government analysts — as single-brief purchases or under a portfolio monitoring retainer. The teaser above shows the headline methodology; the full document includes case-number citations, target INNs, SDN-adjacency numbers, and recommended secondary-designation scope.

Already subscribed? Open the full brief with your analyst credentials. Otherwise, subscribe to portfolio monitoring for the full library, or commission this brief on its own.

Read the full brief → See access options Request by email
Basis and limitations. Findings in this brief are derived from public records — kad.arbitr.ru arbitration filings, EGRUL registry extracts, zakupki.gov.ru procurement contracts, and official sanctions lists — and from algorithmic scoring described in the methodology. Scores are triage outputs, not legal determinations. Court co-litigation measures litigation frequency with listed parties, not culpability; procurement links may reflect arm's-length commerce. Named entities may dispute factual errors via derek.linz@linzalytics.com (subject "Dispute request"); the review process and timelines are on the methodology page, and material corrections are logged at /intel/corrections.html with dates.