← Back to dashboard 🔒 Premium — subscriber access

Designation Brief — ПАО "Ростелеком"

Date: 2026-04-18 Entity: ПАО "Ростелеком" (PJSC Rostelecom) INN: 7707049388 Current status: Not OFAC-designated; already a graph :Target with internal risk_score 85 Sector (graph): electronics (telecommunications backbone) Recommendation: Priority 1 — Immediate designation under EO14024

Headline

Rostelecom is the Russian state telecommunications backbone, currently unsanctioned by OFAC, while demonstrating the highest 2-hop SDN reachability of any keyword-tender winner in our graph: 1,114 distinct sanctioned entities are within two edges of Rostelecom via documented procurement, matching-entity, and litigation relationships. The entity simultaneously wins Russian government keyword tenders for radiocommunications equipment (радиосвязь) and directly co-litigates with 77 already-sanctioned entities across 820 court cases in our dataset.

The quantitative case for designation here exceeds any of the top 10 unsanctioned banks in our prior Financial Enablers report and is on par with the strongest single-entity evidence bundles produced for defense-prime dossiers. The qualitative case — a state telecom monopoly funneling communications hardware procurement around export controls — tracks the same EO14024 logic already applied to МТС-Банк, Gazprombank, and Transmashholding's downstream entities.

🔒 Premium brief — full access

This brief's evidentiary detail, specific targets, and designation recommendations are available to vetted compliance teams, law firms, and government analysts — as single-brief purchases or under a portfolio monitoring retainer. The teaser above shows the headline methodology; the full document includes case-number citations, target INNs, SDN-adjacency numbers, and recommended secondary-designation scope.

Already subscribed? Open the full brief with your analyst credentials. Otherwise, subscribe to portfolio monitoring for the full library, or commission this brief on its own.

Read the full brief → See access options Request by email
Basis and limitations. Findings in this brief are derived from public records — kad.arbitr.ru arbitration filings, EGRUL registry extracts, zakupki.gov.ru procurement contracts, and official sanctions lists — and from algorithmic scoring described in the methodology. Scores are triage outputs, not legal determinations. Court co-litigation measures litigation frequency with listed parties, not culpability; procurement links may reflect arm's-length commerce. Named entities may dispute factual errors via derek.linz@linzalytics.com (subject "Dispute request"); the review process and timelines are on the methodology page, and material corrections are logged at /intel/corrections.html with dates.