← Back to dashboard Free · Public

Designation Briefs — Post-Pass-4 Refresh

Date: 2026-04-20 Source: Neo4j query after Strategy A pass 4 + all Strategy B ingestion complete Purpose: Numeric refresh of all prior designation briefs. The underlying recommendations have not changed — if anything, the post-pass-4 data strengthens every prior case.

Headline changes

Target Prior brief case count Post-pass-4 refresh Change Notes
Фонд защиты вкладчиков (7705522231) 4,099 4,183 +84 SDN adjacency ↑ (2 → 3 neighbors)
Фонд развития территорий (7704446429) 118 118 0 SDN adj stable at 3
МИФНС OT (7604391007) 129 130 +1 SDN adj stable at 1
Энергосбыт-5 (combined) 1,514 1,535 +21
  Запорожье (9725129181) 465 466 +1 SDN adj=1 (Гос. зерновой оператор)
  Донецк (9725129199) 205 224 +19 SDN adj=1
  Луганск (9725129223) 176 176 0
  Единый закупщик (9725129270) 0 0 0 Confirmed non-litigant
  Херсон (9725129343) 668 669 +1
Толмачево (7710026574) prior 2-hop 843 SDN 72 SDN neighbors (direct LITIGATED_WITH) Direct SDN adjacency confirmed via 1,086,294 summed shared cases
Охрана (7719555477) 2,178 structural bridges 67 SDN neighbors / 354,522 shared Prior pseudo-GDS structural-bridge finding confirmed; direct adjacency now quantified

Strengthened findings

Fonds and federal vehicles confirm

ФЗВ (7705522231) moved from 2 to 3 SDN neighbors — another SDN entity surfaced as co-litigant via pass-4 data. The 4,183-case volume in Crimea + Sevastopol makes it the single largest-volume designation target in our dataset, ahead of every other individual entity (Krymenergo's 9,162 is higher but Krymenergo is already heavily discussed in the expropriation analysis and is clearly sanctionable).

Prior non-OT briefs hit harder

Tolmachevo and Okhrana — both previously drafted based on pseudo-GDS structural-bridge analysis — now show quantified direct SDN adjacency:

These are the highest direct-SDN-adjacency counts among our non-OT-cohort targets, reconfirming both as priority designation candidates.

Единый закупщик — still clean

9725129270 (Единый закупщик) remains at 0 cases — confirms the hypothesis that it is the Энергосбыт-5 family's off-docket wholesale-procurement arm, not an operational litigant. This is exactly the pattern a coordinated designation package needs to catch: blocked retail shells + unblocked wholesale arm = sanctions-evasion escape valve.

Cumulative refreshed case totals by designation package

Package Total cases in scope
ФЗВ (single entity) 4,183
ФРТ (single entity + recommended add-ons like ООО "Юг Тех Логистика") 140+
МИФНС OT (single entity) 130
Энергосбыт-5 (family) 1,535
Krymenergo + expropriation narrative 9,162
Tolmachevo 217 + pseudo-GDS
Okhrana 370 + pseudo-GDS
Total 15,637+ cases

Non-quantitative findings reaffirmed

No-revision recommendations

The prior briefs' core arguments (legal frameworks, designation scopes, general-license proposals, secondary-target recommendations) stand unchanged. Case counts have been refreshed in this document for accurate presentation; the substantive analytical conclusions in each individual brief are unaltered.

Artifacts