← Back to dashboard 🔒 Premium — subscriber access

Eurostat Triangulation — EU27 → Hub → Russia

Hypothesis: If EU exports to an intermediary country surge on a category AND that intermediary's exports to Russia on the same category also surge, the intermediary is a triangulated circumvention channel with EU origin.

Rule: EU→hub growth ≥ 1.3x AND hub→Russia growth ≥ 1.5x (both 2023 vs 2021)

Triangulated Channels

Hub SITC EU→Hub '21 EU→Hub '23 EU leg Hub→RU leg Combined
Kyrgyzstan SITC5: Chemicals & related p €0M €0M 3.21x 122.29x 392.55
Kyrgyzstan SITC6+8: Manufactured goods €0M €0M 9.84x 23.52x 231.44
Armenia SITC7: Machinery & transport €0M €0M 4.18x 46.40x 193.95
Kyrgyzstan SITC7: Machinery & transport €0M €0M 20.61x 8.86x 182.60
Kazakhstan SITC6+8: Manufactured goods €0M €0M 2.30x 8.92x 20.52
Kazakhstan SITC7: Machinery & transport €0M €0M 2.65x 6.63x 17.57
Armenia SITC6+8: Manufactured goods €0M €0M 2.47x 6.94x 17.14
Turkey SITC6+8: Manufactured goods €0M €0M 1.38x 6.80x 9.38
Georgia SITC7: Machinery & transport €0M €0M 2.32x 3.02x 7.01
Kazakhstan SITC5: Chemicals & related p €0M €0M 1.46x 4.40x 6.42
UAE SITC7: Machinery & transport €0M €0M 1.31x 3.57x 4.68
Turkey SITC7: Machinery & transport €0M €0M 1.80x 2.16x 3.89
Armenia SITC5: Chemicals & related p €0M €0M 2.01x 1.88x 3.78
Serbia SITC7: Machinery & transport €0M €0M 1.32x 2.16x 2.85
Georgia SITC5: Chemicals & related p €0M €0M 1.42x 1.80x 2.56

🔒 Premium brief — full access

This brief's evidentiary detail, specific targets, and designation recommendations are available to vetted compliance teams, law firms, and government analysts — as single-brief purchases or under a portfolio monitoring retainer. The teaser above shows the headline methodology; the full document includes case-number citations, target INNs, SDN-adjacency numbers, and recommended secondary-designation scope.

Already subscribed? Open the full brief with your analyst credentials. Otherwise, subscribe to portfolio monitoring for the full library, or commission this brief on its own.

Read the full brief → See access options Request by email
Basis and limitations. Findings in this brief are derived from public records — kad.arbitr.ru arbitration filings, EGRUL registry extracts, zakupki.gov.ru procurement contracts, and official sanctions lists — and from algorithmic scoring described in the methodology. Scores are triage outputs, not legal determinations. Court co-litigation measures litigation frequency with listed parties, not culpability; procurement links may reflect arm's-length commerce. Named entities may dispute factual errors via derek.linz@linzalytics.com (subject "Dispute request"); the review process and timelines are on the methodology page, and material corrections are logged at /intel/corrections.html with dates.