← Back to dashboard 🔒 Premium — subscriber access

Georgia — Re-Export Trajectory to Russia

Source: GeoStat (საქსტატი) bulk XLSX, 2014-2026 time series Method: Re-exports = Total Exports − Domestic Exports (GeoStat's own definition)

Georgia is unusual among transshipment hubs: the National Statistics Office explicitly separates domestic exports (goods made in Georgia) from total exports (including goods imported then re-exported). The difference is a clean re-export number, without assumptions.

Georgia ↔ Russia Annual Flows (USD Millions)

Year Total Exports Domestic Re-exports Re-exp share Imports from RU
2018 $437.8M $383.3M $54.5M 12.4% $934.7M
2019 $497.0M $438.9M $58.1M 11.7% $977.1M
2020 $440.6M $409.0M $31.6M 7.2% $888.5M
2021 $610.1M $562.5M $47.5M 7.8% $1,023.1M
2022 $642.4M $537.9M $104.5M 16.3% $1,835.5M
2023 $657.0M $559.4M $97.7M 14.9% $1,744.3M
2024 $679.6M $651.5M $28.1M 4.1% $1,849.1M
2025 $749.3M $700.7M $48.6M 6.5% $1,939.4M

🔒 Premium brief — full access

This brief's evidentiary detail, specific targets, and designation recommendations are available to vetted compliance teams, law firms, and government analysts — as single-brief purchases or under a portfolio monitoring retainer. The teaser above shows the headline methodology; the full document includes case-number citations, target INNs, SDN-adjacency numbers, and recommended secondary-designation scope.

Already subscribed? Open the full brief with your analyst credentials. Otherwise, subscribe to portfolio monitoring for the full library, or commission this brief on its own.

Read the full brief → See access options Request by email
Basis and limitations. Findings in this brief are derived from public records — kad.arbitr.ru arbitration filings, EGRUL registry extracts, zakupki.gov.ru procurement contracts, and official sanctions lists — and from algorithmic scoring described in the methodology. Scores are triage outputs, not legal determinations. Court co-litigation measures litigation frequency with listed parties, not culpability; procurement links may reflect arm's-length commerce. Named entities may dispute factual errors via derek.linz@linzalytics.com (subject "Dispute request"); the review process and timelines are on the methodology page, and material corrections are logged at /intel/corrections.html with dates.