Sanctions Intelligence Report
Classification: ANALYTICAL PRODUCT Generated: 2026-07-19 01:31 CEST Methodology: Court-case intelligence × procurement data × OFAC SDN cross-match
Executive Summary
Analysis of 2531430 court-derived organizations reveals an 99.6% court coverage gap, while 91.3% of the tracked procurement spend remains unsanctioned.
Key Findings
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Organizations analyzed | 2531430 |
| Currently sanctioned (OFAC) | 10025 (0.4%) |
| NOT sanctioned | 2521354 (99.6%) |
| High-confidence evasion enablers | 25451 |
| Hidden suppliers (defense-linked) | 269 |
| Network hubs (degree ≥ 5) | 71439 |
| Financial enablers identified | 1616 |
Consistency Snapshot
| Check | Value |
|---|---|
| Procurement unsanctioned spend | 91.3% of €444.9B |
| Court visibility gap | 181 of 2888921 orgs |
| Supplier universe | 99,034 total / 1,000 searchable |
| Audit status | WARN (0 fails, 1 warnings) |
| Latest source timestamp | 2026-07-19T01:09:26+02:00 |
🔒 Premium brief — full access
This brief's evidentiary detail, specific targets, and designation recommendations are available to vetted compliance teams, law firms, and government analysts — as single-brief purchases or under a portfolio monitoring retainer. The teaser above shows the headline methodology; the full document includes case-number citations, target INNs, SDN-adjacency numbers, and recommended secondary-designation scope.
Already subscribed? Open the full brief with your analyst credentials. Otherwise, subscribe to portfolio monitoring for the full library, or commission this brief on its own.
Read the full brief → See access options Request by email