SANCTIONS INTELLIGENCE REPORT
Classification: ANALYTICAL PRODUCT Generated: 2026-04-20 20:54 CEST Methodology: Court-case intelligence × procurement data × OFAC SDN cross-match
Executive Summary
Analysis of 269551 court-derived organizations reveals an 98.8% court coverage gap, while 91.3% of the tracked procurement spend remains unsanctioned.
Key Findings
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Organizations analyzed | 269551 |
| Currently sanctioned (OFAC) | 3182 (1.2%) |
| NOT sanctioned | 266369 (98.8%) |
| High-confidence evasion enablers | 8674 |
| Hidden suppliers (defense-linked) | 0 |
| Network hubs (degree ≥ 5) | 0 |
| Financial enablers identified | 805 |
Consistency Snapshot
| Check | Value |
|---|---|
| Procurement unsanctioned spend | 91.3% of $641.5B |
| Court visibility gap | 181 of 342258 orgs |
| Supplier universe | 98,761 total / 1,000 searchable |
| Audit status | WARN (0 fails, 1 warnings) |
| Latest source timestamp | 2026-04-20T20:01:07+02:00 |
🔒 Premium brief — request full access
This brief's evidentiary detail, specific targets, and designation recommendations are available to subscribing compliance teams, law firms, and government analysts. The teaser above shows the headline methodology; the full document includes case-number citations, target INNs, SDN-adjacency numbers, and recommended secondary-designation scope.
Email derek.linz@linzalytics.com or click below to request access. Include your organization, role, and intended use.
Request access → See pricing tiers